Tara Reade: Biden’s foreign policy isn’t just a failure, it’s an existential crisis
The world is on the brink of nuclear war, but the situation could have been avoided if the US had chosen dialogue instead of confrontation
By Tara Reade, an RT contributor, author, geopolitical analyst and former Senate Aide. You can find Tara’s work at tarareadepodcast.com
By Tara Reade, an RT contributor, author, geopolitical analyst and former Senate Aide. You can find Tara’s work at tarareadepodcast.com
@ReadeAlexandra FILE PHOTO. © Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images The US government has long touted its role as a beacon of diplomacy and stability, but the Biden administration’s foreign policy lays bare the tragic reality: A pattern of hubris, aggression, and reckless decision-making. Instead of fostering peace, key players such as Antony Blinken, Victoria Nuland, James Rubin, and Jake Sullivan have driven the US to the brink of World War III by engaging in dangerous provocations with Russia. These figures are well known, although some remain in the shadows more than others. For instance, Rubin has worked with Biden since the 1990s and was mentored by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. You rarely see him in front of the cameras but his hawkish diplomacy style (or lack thereof) has its fingerprints all over the Biden regime’s foreign policy positions. The escalation didn’t begin with Joe Biden either. Former President Barack Obama and other elites were all over Ukraine’s 2014 Maidan coup, where the US helped orchestrate the ousting of a democratically elected government, one that had sought cooperation with Moscow. For the past eight years, this interventionist, aggressive approach has left a trail of destruction, destabilizing Eastern Europe and alienating nations that have long resisted the West’s hegemony. Yet, under Biden, this dangerous trajectory has accelerated. Let’s consider the Minsk agreements, which were supposed to be a roadmap to peace in eastern Ukraine. Instead of pressuring Kiev to honor its commitments, Washington abandoned diplomacy and doubled down on its anti-Russia stance, pushing NATO’s military infrastructure ever closer to Russia’s borders. These actions ignored years of warnings from experts who cautioned that such moves would leave Moscow with no choice but to respond. Not to mention the thousands of sanctions against Russia in an attempt to freeze its economy. But Russia has proven as impervious to frozen assets as it is to winter. The Russian economy is now ranked fourth in the world by purchasing power parity. The Biden administration has effectively surrounded itself with hawks who are less interested in negotiation and more intent on maintaining US dominance at any cost. Victoria Nuland, the former under secretary of state infamous for her leaked “F**k the EU” comment during the Maidan crisis, embodies the disdain for genuine diplomacy that has infected Washington. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, with his unyielding approach to international relations, has proven incapable of understanding the value of compromise. Meanwhile, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan’s focus on projecting short-term US power undermines long-term global stability. Sullivan’s anti-China sentiments are also well known. The nightmare team Biden and Obama had around them are a reason for failed diplomacy, the botched withdrawal from Afghanistan, and endless wars amping up. It is well known that Washington has turned Ukraine into a proxy battlefield and Blackrock playground. According to General Michael Flynn in a recent X panel that I also took part in, Ukraine is a big money laundering scheme for the globalist elites. Biden has been feeding billions of taxpayer dollars into a war effort designed not to protect Ukrainian sovereignty but to weaken Russia as a front to enrich a few and destroy many. This unconscionable strategy has brought the world closer to nuclear confrontation than at any point since the Cold War. The administration’s insistence on escalation, rather than conversation, demonstrates a stunning disregard for human life – not just in Eastern Europe but worldwide. Yet the failures of US foreign policy don’t end there. By treating Russia as a pariah state and dismissing its legitimate security concerns, the Biden administration has pushed Moscow into strengthening alliances with other global powers, most notably China. The US’ actions have also alienated the Global South, where nations increasingly view Washington as a destabilizing force. The BRICS group – which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Iran, Ethiopia, and the UAE – has emerged as a counterweight to US hegemony, with its member nations openly rejecting the dollar’s dominance and the unipolar world order. The tragedy is that this was all avoidable. Washington had countless opportunities to engage in meaningful dialogue with Moscow. Instead, it chose the path of arrogance, dismissing diplomacy as weakness and treating great-power competition as a zero-sum game. In doing so, the Biden administration has not only endangered the American people but also placed the entire world on the precipice of a nuclear exchange. As someone who has seen the darker side of US politics, I know firsthand how Washington’s obsession with power can leave devastation in its wake. The Biden administration’s foreign policy isn’t just a failure – it’s an existential crisis. The question now is whether there is still time to change course. The stakes could not be higher. The world doesn’t need more war. The world needs leaders who are not interested in profiting from war, but in stability and peace. Russian President Vladimir Putin has been showing patience so far. As he has stated many times, Russia truly does not want to war with NATO and the US, but how many more of Russia’s red lines will be crossed? The clock is ticking until President-elect Donald Trump takes office – hopefully with a different foreign policy strategy. Until that happens, we are all living on borrowed time. The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
